Skip to content

[PWGCF] Feature/lambdacascade correlation#14631

Draft
Oveissheibani wants to merge 4 commits intoAliceO2Group:masterfrom
Oveissheibani:feature/lambdacascade-correlation
Draft

[PWGCF] Feature/lambdacascade correlation#14631
Oveissheibani wants to merge 4 commits intoAliceO2Group:masterfrom
Oveissheibani:feature/lambdacascade-correlation

Conversation

@Oveissheibani
Copy link

Simple correlation task for Lambda(anti-Lambda) – Cascade pairs.

Includes:

  • Δphi and Δy correlations
  • Efficiency from CCDB
  • QA histograms

Added to PWGCF/TwoParticleCorrelations/Tasks.
Updated CMakeLists.txt.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 26, 2026

O2 linter results: ❌ 43 errors, ⚠️ 15 warnings, 🔕 0 disabled

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Feature/lambdacascade correlation [PWGCF] Feature/lambdacascade correlation Jan 26, 2026
@Oveissheibani Oveissheibani force-pushed the feature/lambdacascade-correlation branch 5 times, most recently from a311293 to a90c6aa Compare January 26, 2026 04:05
@Oveissheibani Oveissheibani force-pushed the feature/lambdacascade-correlation branch from a90c6aa to 19114ff Compare January 26, 2026 04:11
Oveissheibani added a commit to Oveissheibani/O2Physics that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2026
Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#14631
#include "Common/DataModel/CollisionAssociationTables.h"
#include "Common/DataModel/EventSelection.h"
#include "Common/DataModel/Multiplicity.h"
#include "Common/DataModel/PIDResponse.h"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is obsolete
It was split between TPC and TOF in a previous PR
If you were able to compile your code locally, I guess you did, that means that your code is not updated to the latest version
This is consistent with the message in the PR pointing at conflicts in the branch
Please, rebase your changes to the latest version of O2Physics

Copy link
Collaborator

@victor-gonzalez victor-gonzalez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please, rebase your changes to the latest version of O2Physics and compile locally to fix potential needed changes

@vkucera
Copy link
Collaborator

vkucera commented Feb 24, 2026

@Oveissheibani @victor-gonzalez Is this PR still supposed to be merged?

@vkucera
Copy link
Collaborator

vkucera commented Mar 5, 2026

@Oveissheibani @victor-gonzalez Ping

@Oveissheibani
Copy link
Author

Oveissheibani commented Mar 5, 2026 via email

@vkucera
Copy link
Collaborator

vkucera commented Mar 5, 2026

Hi @Oveissheibani , thanks for the update.
There is no need to close the PR if you still want to merge it later. (Please do not duplicate PRs.)
However, if you do not intend to merge it now, please keep it open as a draft.
When you manage to update the PR, feel free to mark it ready for review again.

@vkucera vkucera marked this pull request as draft March 6, 2026 14:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants