Skip to content

Conversation

@lgritz
Copy link
Collaborator

@lgritz lgritz commented Dec 12, 2025

If we don't specify anything, it seems that Ptex will think it's using C++98, which it is in fact not capable of doing.

Meanwhile, since OIIO's own minimum requirement is C++17, it certainly meand that any compiler we're using can support 17 as a minimum when building Ptex as well.

If we don't specify anything, it seems that Ptex will think it's
using C++98, which it is in fact not capable of doing.

Meanwhile, since OIIO's own minimum requirement is C++17, it certainly
meand that any compiler we're using can support 17 as a minimum when
building Ptex as well.

Signed-off-by: Larry Gritz <lg@larrygritz.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@EmilDohne EmilDohne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like CI failures are unrelated, LGTM

@lgritz lgritz merged commit febafce into AcademySoftwareFoundation:main Dec 15, 2025
29 of 32 checks passed
@lgritz lgritz deleted the lg-ptexbuild branch December 17, 2025 07:19
lgritz added a commit to lgritz/OpenImageIO that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2025
…ndation#4978)

If we don't specify anything, it seems that Ptex will think it's using
C++98, which it is in fact not capable of doing.

Meanwhile, since OIIO's own minimum requirement is C++17, it certainly
meand that any compiler we're using can support 17 as a minimum when
building Ptex as well.

Signed-off-by: Larry Gritz <lg@larrygritz.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants