Bugfix: lcs trace is not supported for Belady#292
Bugfix: lcs trace is not supported for Belady#292haochengxia merged 2 commits into1a1a11a:developfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @shermanjlim, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a logical error in the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly fixes a bug where the 'belady' eviction algorithm would incorrectly fail when used with an 'lcs' trace. The conditional logic has been corrected. I have added one suggestion to prevent a potential null pointer dereference that could lead to a crash.
|
Yes, exactly — that should align with how BeladySize behaves. Thanks for your PR! |
I think there's a typo in the conditionals when checking if we can support lcs trace for the Belady algo. It seems like it should be supported