[Feature Request] .check method for v3

[reneweteling]

Turns out it was implemented in v2 the .check method

https://zenstack.dev/docs/2.x/guides/check-permission

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Yes my schema defines permissions per row, some rows are editable, deleteable etc by a certain user, only my frontend is not aware of this. Currenly im mimicking my policies in some sort of permission layer to figure out if i need to show or hide a edit button in my admin area.

Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to have a similar solution as in Ruby's best authorisation plugin CanCanCan as explained here: https://github.com/CanCanCommunity/cancancan/blob/develop/docs/define_check_abilities.md

# check if a user is allowed to create a model (name is Article)
can? :create, Article, user: user

# or update a specific articel instance
@article = Article.find(params[:id])

can? :update, @article, user: user

Lets switch back to zensteack, i would like something like this, lets take the user policy

taken from https://zenstack.dev/docs/orm/access-control/write-policies

model User {
    id    Int    @id @default(autoincrement())
    email String @unique
    posts Post[]

    // open to signup, profiles are public
    @@allow('create,read', true)

    // the user himself has full access
    @@allow('all', auth().id == id)
}

This could be a solution?

const userDb = authDb.$setAuth(user);

// something like this? to see if a policiy is applicable, so that i could show a [create] button or whatever
userDb.user.isAllowedTo('create')

// than for a row based
userDb.user.findUnique({where: {id: auth().id}}).isAllowedTo('update')

Im searching for this isAllowedTo or in CanCanCan the can? method.

Describe alternatives you've considered
No ive got my Ai going over all my policies and it writes a permission.ts and this a horrible developmentflow.