You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Following on #256 I wanted to move this to the discussion forum.
The PR #257 is clearly not applicable at this point, because it would break compatibility of the existing API.
So this discussion is, to explore, if there is value in adding additional methods with double arguments to a possible future MR of the API?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Following on #256 I wanted to move this to the discussion forum.
The PR #257 is clearly not applicable at this point, because it would break compatibility of the existing API.
So this discussion is, to explore, if there is value in adding additional methods with double arguments to a possible future MR of the API?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions