The newly released note request data is said to have four columns "userId tweetId createdAtMillis sourceLink". I notice that a non-trivial amount of tweetId seem to be abnormal.
Example:
cat batSignals-00000.tsv| grep $'\t91540'
C23DBB56A37D9566AE659462EA431791A55D9403F8E0B54E5E5899E236B9526A 9154089611629224624 1724916211485
BE177514EB62FA0F486A310A3DD07698C591ACE5077E70E5B5E9AFC105DD2DCE 9154092414728527376 1726533818655
Usually, tweetId starts with "1" but the above two tweetIds start with "9". I also searched for all requests proposed by the first userId.
cat batSignals-00000.tsv| grep C23DBB56A37D9566AE659462EA431791A55D9403F8E0B54E5E5899E236B9526A
C23DBB56A37D9566AE659462EA431791A55D9403F8E0B54E5E5899E236B9526A 977040036244765513 1724916298043
C23DBB56A37D9566AE659462EA431791A55D9403F8E0B54E5E5899E236B9526A 1828757772290400291 1724935602779
C23DBB56A37D9566AE659462EA431791A55D9403F8E0B54E5E5899E236B9526A 2684673839852374649 1724319335350
C23DBB56A37D9566AE659462EA431791A55D9403F8E0B54E5E5899E236B9526A 2951003568237083342 1725515064463
C23DBB56A37D9566AE659462EA431791A55D9403F8E0B54E5E5899E236B9526A 3324343820942848469 1724258023892
C23DBB56A37D9566AE659462EA431791A55D9403F8E0B54E5E5899E236B9526A 3561937426136355544 1724743384355
C23DBB56A37D9566AE659462EA431791A55D9403F8E0B54E5E5899E236B9526A 4137635619809309092 1724258370090
C23DBB56A37D9566AE659462EA431791A55D9403F8E0B54E5E5899E236B9526A 4952653969869310800 1724936298653
C23DBB56A37D9566AE659462EA431791A55D9403F8E0B54E5E5899E236B9526A 5651508576841648976 1725515613590
C23DBB56A37D9566AE659462EA431791A55D9403F8E0B54E5E5899E236B9526A 5724641268837992313 1724326146100
C23DBB56A37D9566AE659462EA431791A55D9403F8E0B54E5E5899E236B9526A 6905583205459998959 1724916234226
C23DBB56A37D9566AE659462EA431791A55D9403F8E0B54E5E5899E236B9526A 6985250573715648597 1724257857799
C23DBB56A37D9566AE659462EA431791A55D9403F8E0B54E5E5899E236B9526A 7195974708253445253 1724126266603
C23DBB56A37D9566AE659462EA431791A55D9403F8E0B54E5E5899E236B9526A 7538073314496696227 1724937322549
C23DBB56A37D9566AE659462EA431791A55D9403F8E0B54E5E5899E236B9526A 7820944466784416933 1725108506437
C23DBB56A37D9566AE659462EA431791A55D9403F8E0B54E5E5899E236B9526A 8558507768692594852 1725108335051
C23DBB56A37D9566AE659462EA431791A55D9403F8E0B54E5E5899E236B9526A 9154089611629224624 1724916211485
It looks like all of this person's requests are on some sort of abnormal tweetIds. All of these tweets are not available on X. Is there a bug in exporting tweetIds for the note request data?
Updated: The requests with abnormal tweetIds are very small fraction---about 0.09%.
The newly released note request data is said to have four columns "userId tweetId createdAtMillis sourceLink". I notice that a non-trivial amount of tweetId seem to be abnormal.
Example:
Usually, tweetId starts with "1" but the above two tweetIds start with "9". I also searched for all requests proposed by the first userId.
It looks like all of this person's requests are on some sort of abnormal tweetIds. All of these tweets are not available on X. Is there a bug in exporting tweetIds for the note request data?
Updated: The requests with abnormal tweetIds are very small fraction---about 0.09%.