Skip to content

Commit 7c8a399

Browse files
committed
bd: backup 2026-03-09 17:27
1 parent d055a6b commit 7c8a399

File tree

3 files changed

+7
-5
lines changed

3 files changed

+7
-5
lines changed

.beads/backup/backup_state.json

Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
11
{
2-
"last_dolt_commit": "ks1iasqarfn6gv35g5vqm35h3u4uv0dr",
2+
"last_dolt_commit": "1mado597vug6o8vk9voqcinlvk6rv1h0",
33
"last_event_id": 0,
4-
"timestamp": "2026-03-09T17:09:30.455394351Z",
4+
"timestamp": "2026-03-09T17:27:55.748463217Z",
55
"counts": {
66
"issues": 15,
7-
"events": 37,
7+
"events": 39,
88
"comments": 0,
99
"dependencies": 10,
1010
"labels": 0,

.beads/backup/events.jsonl

Lines changed: 2 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -35,3 +35,5 @@
3535
{"actor":"sjarmak","comment":null,"created_at":"2026-03-09T16:24:17Z","event_type":"closed","id":35,"issue_id":"CodeScaleBench-25b.1","new_value":"Done","old_value":""}
3636
{"actor":"sjarmak","comment":null,"created_at":"2026-03-09T16:28:56Z","event_type":"claimed","id":36,"issue_id":"CodeScaleBench-25b.2","new_value":"{\"assignee\":\"sjarmak\",\"status\":\"in_progress\"}","old_value":"{\"id\":\"CodeScaleBench-25b.2\",\"title\":\"Define standard validation_result schema for canonical verifiers\",\"description\":\"Goal\\nDefine the common verifier output contract that all canonical tasks should converge on in addition to reward.txt.\\n\\nScope\\n- Specify required and optional fields.\\n- Distinguish continuous reward from pass/fail semantics.\\n- Cover both deterministic verifiers and answer.json-derived artifact verifiers.\\n- Ensure the schema can represent partial credit, verifier failures, and missing output cleanly.\\n\\nWhy\\nToday reward.txt is universal, but the richer semantics are inconsistent and often lost.\",\"acceptance_criteria\":\"1. A single validation_result schema is defined for canonical tasks. 2. The schema includes scorer_family, reward, pass_threshold, passed, sub_scores, output_contract, and failure/error context. 3. The schema is documented in reference docs and is implementable from shell/Python verifiers without ambiguity.\",\"status\":\"open\",\"priority\":1,\"issue_type\":\"task\",\"owner\":\"sjarmak@users.noreply.github.com\",\"created_at\":\"2026-03-09T16:05:19Z\",\"created_by\":\"sjarmak\",\"updated_at\":\"2026-03-09T16:05:19Z\"}"}
3737
{"actor":"sjarmak","comment":null,"created_at":"2026-03-09T17:09:30Z","event_type":"claimed","id":37,"issue_id":"CodeScaleBench-25b.3","new_value":"{\"assignee\":\"sjarmak\",\"status\":\"in_progress\"}","old_value":"{\"id\":\"CodeScaleBench-25b.3\",\"title\":\"Close artifact-mode coverage gaps in the 275 canonical tasks\",\"description\":\"Goal\\nBring the canonical set closer to the intended hybrid evaluation model by closing answer.json/artifact support gaps where feasible.\\n\\nKnown baseline\\nA local audit found 42 canonical tasks without Dockerfile.artifact_only support. SDLC suites are the main source of gaps.\\n\\nScope\\n- Add artifact-mode Dockerfiles and verifier bridges where appropriate.\\n- Reuse answer_json_verifier_lib.sh when it fits; avoid bespoke one-offs.\\n- For tasks that should remain deterministic-only, document the reason explicitly.\\n\\nWhy\\nThe canonical benchmark should not imply universal hybrid evaluation if a non-trivial subset cannot actually run that way.\",\"acceptance_criteria\":\"1. Every canonical task either supports artifact_only evaluation or is explicitly marked as a documented exception. 2. Missing artifact-mode tasks are either remediated or tracked individually with rationale. 3. Representative smoke coverage exists for each family touched by the remediation work.\",\"status\":\"open\",\"priority\":1,\"issue_type\":\"task\",\"owner\":\"sjarmak@users.noreply.github.com\",\"created_at\":\"2026-03-09T16:05:19Z\",\"created_by\":\"sjarmak\",\"updated_at\":\"2026-03-09T16:05:19Z\"}"}
38+
{"actor":"sjarmak","comment":null,"created_at":"2026-03-09T17:10:17Z","event_type":"closed","id":38,"issue_id":"CodeScaleBench-25b.2","new_value":"Pushed a227d2eb0 on main with the canonical validation_result contract docs, audit, and maintained verifier script updates.","old_value":""}
39+
{"actor":"sjarmak","comment":null,"created_at":"2026-03-09T17:27:55Z","event_type":"closed","id":39,"issue_id":"CodeScaleBench-25b.3","new_value":"Completed artifact-mode coverage migration in d055a6b6a (Dockerfile.artifact_only coverage closed, answer_json verifier bridges added, no_artifact smoke checks passing).","old_value":""}

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)