docs: confusing wording in `extern` documentation related to lib linkage

[iamlockon]

It says below:

rust/library/std/src/keyword_docs.rs

Line 474 in f5eca4f

/// If compiled as a dylib, the resulting .so could then be linked to from a C library, and the

But according to the reference^[1][2] , dylib is Rust dynamic library which is meant for Rust consumers (not for C consumers). Shouldn't cdylib be the right term here?

[1] https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/linkage.html#r-link.dylib
[2] https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/linkage.html#r-link.cdylib

[iamlockon]

I am happy to create a pull request to resolve this if my concern is valid.

[bjorn3]

That comment may be referring to both rust dylibs and cdylibs. Both can be used by C consumers, though cdylibs are recommended if there are no Rust consumers as they can omit anything that only a Rust consumer would be able to use.