@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ msgid ""
1212msgstr ""
1313"Project-Id-Version : Python 3.11\n "
1414"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To : \n "
15- "POT-Creation-Date : 2024-03-01 16:38 +0000\n "
15+ "POT-Creation-Date : 2024-03-15 16:48 +0000\n "
1616"PO-Revision-Date : 2023-05-24 02:10+0000\n "
1717"Last-Translator : Stefan Ocetkiewicz <stefan.ocetkiewicz@gmail.com>, 2023\n "
1818"Language-Team : Polish (https://app.transifex.com/python-doc/teams/5390/pl/)\n "
@@ -360,9 +360,11 @@ msgid "Why isn't there a switch or case statement in Python?"
360360msgstr ""
361361
362362msgid ""
363- "You can do this easily enough with a sequence of ``if... elif... elif... "
364- "else``. For literal values, or constants within a namespace, you can also "
365- "use a ``match ... case`` statement."
363+ "In general, structured switch statements execute one block of code when an "
364+ "expression has a particular value or set of values. Since Python 3.10 one "
365+ "can easily match literal values, or constants within a namespace, with a "
366+ "``match ... case`` statement. An older alternative is a sequence of ``if... "
367+ "elif... elif... else``."
366368msgstr ""
367369
368370msgid ""
@@ -383,6 +385,11 @@ msgid ""
383385"your object."
384386msgstr ""
385387
388+ msgid ""
389+ "Imitating switch with fallthrough, as with C's switch-case-default, is "
390+ "possible, much harder, and less needed."
391+ msgstr ""
392+
386393msgid ""
387394"Can't you emulate threads in the interpreter instead of relying on an OS-"
388395"specific thread implementation?"
0 commit comments