Fix intra-links

Author: joshuabambrick

peps/pep-0736.rst

@@ -433,10 +433,10 @@ judgement about whether it is prudent to use it in any given context. We do not
 recommend enforcing a rule to use the feature in all cases where it may be 
 applicable, such as via lint rules or style guides.
 
-As described `above <This syntax increases coupling>`__, we propose that a
-reasonable rule of thumb would be to use this in cases where a parameter and its
-argument have the same semantics in order to reduce unintentional
-desynchronisation without causing inappropriate coupling.
+As described in `This syntax increases coupling`_, we propose that a reasonable
+rule of thumb would be to use this in cases where a parameter and its argument
+have the same semantics in order to reduce unintentional desynchronisation
+without causing inappropriate coupling.
 
 Impact on Editing
 =================
@@ -456,8 +456,8 @@ keyword argument would not exist at function definition, in the vast majority
 of cases.
 
 If the developer leaves the argument name unchanged and forgets to update its
-value, a ``NameError`` will typically be raised as described
-`above <Renaming the variable in the calling context will break the code>`__.
+value, a ``NameError`` will typically be raised as described in
+`Renaming the variable in the calling context will break the code`_.
 
 Proposals for IDEs
 ------------------