Evaluate the requirement for having admin level permissions for rukpak controller

[varshaprasad96]

Currently, we specify rukpak controller to have admin level permissions:

rukpak/internal/controllers/bundledeployment/bundledeployment.go

Line 162 in 1d284f9

//+kubebuilder:rbac:groups=*,resources=*,verbs=*

This seems to be required to be able to manage the lifecycle of bundle resources effectively.

This issue is to evaluate the requirement for having this level of elevated permissions (Even if the outcome could be that we need to have it this way).

[github-actions]

This issue has become stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. The maintainers of this repo will remove this label during issue triage or it will be removed automatically after an update. Adding the lifecycle/frozen label will cause this issue to ignore lifecycle events.

[skattoju]

we would still need list and watch on all objects even after using the service account provided in spec right ?
//+kubebuilder:rbac:groups=*,resources=*,verbs=list;watch