Skip to content

[Multi-provider] Reconsider type of "originalMetadata" #1792

@toddbaert

Description

@toddbaert

For now I kept originalMetadata as Map<String, Metadata> to match how buildProviders currently treats provider names as keys.
I agree a List<KeyValuePair<String, Metadata>> could better represent duplicate names; happy to open a follow-up issue to discuss that representation and adjust the metadata type there if we decide to support duplicates fully.

Originally posted by @Vishalup29 in #1765 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions