Inspired by #1992.
It appears that mini.ai conflicts with Neovim 0.12’s incremental selection feature. Additionally, some of mini.ai’s features are now natively supported in Neovim.
For example, in
|
-- - va) - [V]isually select [A]round [)]paren |
|
-- - yinq - [Y]ank [I]nside [N]ext [Q]uote |
|
-- - ci' - [C]hange [I]nside [']quote |
features 1 and 3 are already available in a plain
nvim --clean session, at least as of Neovim 0.12 (possibly even earlier).
Of course, there are still some nice-to-have features, like "q" for quotes and "n" for next. But are these additions truly worth including as defaults in kickstart?
Inspired by #1992.
It appears that
mini.aiconflicts with Neovim 0.12’s incremental selection feature. Additionally, some ofmini.ai’s features are now natively supported in Neovim.For example, in
kickstart.nvim/init.lua
Lines 840 to 842 in c0cc054
features 1 and 3 are already available in a plain
nvim --cleansession, at least as of Neovim 0.12 (possibly even earlier).Of course, there are still some nice-to-have features, like "q" for quotes and "n" for next. But are these additions truly worth including as defaults in
kickstart?