Skip to content

Commit 86f00c4

Browse files
committed
Fixed BXNL doc
1 parent 9b6348e commit 86f00c4

File tree

1 file changed

+6
-6
lines changed

1 file changed

+6
-6
lines changed

BXNL/Readme.md

Lines changed: 6 additions & 6 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ and is also part of the [NAG Optimization Modelling Suite](https://www.nag.co.uk
2020
Figure 1 shows an illustrative simple problem of data fitting ([more details](./orbit_ex/Readme.md)). The task is to find the optimal orbit path given a variety of measurements for which the orbit has to approximatly pass-by.
2121

2222
<figure style="display:flex;">
23-
<img src="./images/est_orbit.png" alt="Optimal orbit from data orbit measurements."/>
24-
<img src="./images/estw_orbit.png" alt="Weighted optimal orbit from data orbit measurements."/>
23+
<img src="./images/est_orbit.png" width="50%" alt="Optimal orbit from data orbit measurements."/>
24+
<img src="./images/estw_orbit.png" width="50%" alt="Weighted optimal orbit from data orbit measurements."/>
2525
</figure>
2626

2727
**Figure 1.** Example of a NLLS orbital data fitting.
@@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ parameters for the two distributions (red and blue curves in right plot in Figur
5151
Adding these together produces the green curve which is the one used to perform the fitting with.
5252

5353
<figure style="display:flex;">
54-
<img src="./images/tracks.png" alt="PADC etch track diameter histogram unfolding"/>
55-
<img src="./images/fig-unfolding.png" alt="Experimental histogram of track diameter"/>
54+
<img src="./images/tracks.png" width="50%" alt="PADC etch track diameter histogram unfolding"/>
55+
<img src="./images/fig-unfolding.png" width="50%" alt="Experimental histogram of track diameter"/>
5656
</figure>
5757

5858
**Figure 2.** Left: example of a PADC target with alpha
@@ -79,8 +79,8 @@ are highly encourage to try out the new solver.
7979

8080
<figure style="display:flex;">
8181
<img src="./images/b-ral_sif-e04gg-e04gb-NT.png" width="33%" alt="Performance Profile (time:seconds)"/>
82-
<img src="./images/b-ral_sif-e04gg-e04gb-NF.png" alt="Performance Profile (number of function calls)"/>
83-
<img src="./images/b-ral_sif-e04gg-e04gb-NG.png" alt="Performance Profile (number of gradient calls)"/>
82+
<img src="./images/b-ral_sif-e04gg-e04gb-NF.png" width="33%" alt="Performance Profile (number of function calls)"/>
83+
<img src="./images/b-ral_sif-e04gg-e04gb-NG.png" width="33%" alt="Performance Profile (number of gradient calls)"/>
8484
</figure>
8585

8686
**Figure 3.** Performance profiles comparing solvers e04gg and e04gb over 68 CUTEst unconstrained nonlinear least-squares problems.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)