Commit 223e7e4
committed
patch_parse: reject patches with multiple old/new paths
It's currently possible to have patches with multiple old path name
headers. As we didn't check for this case, this resulted in a memory
leak when overwriting the old old path with the new old path because we
simply discarded the old pointer.
Instead of fixing this by free'ing the old pointer, we should reject
such patches altogether. It doesn't make any sense for the "---" or
"+++" markers to occur multiple times within a patch n the first place.
This also implicitly fixes the memory leak.1 parent b246bed commit 223e7e4
3 files changed
+30
-2
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
91 | 91 | | |
92 | 92 | | |
93 | 93 | | |
94 | | - | |
| 94 | + | |
95 | 95 | | |
| 96 | + | |
| 97 | + | |
96 | 98 | | |
97 | 99 | | |
| 100 | + | |
| 101 | + | |
98 | 102 | | |
99 | 103 | | |
100 | 104 | | |
| |||
104 | 108 | | |
105 | 109 | | |
106 | 110 | | |
| 111 | + | |
| 112 | + | |
| 113 | + | |
| 114 | + | |
| 115 | + | |
| 116 | + | |
107 | 117 | | |
108 | 118 | | |
109 | 119 | | |
| |||
120 | 130 | | |
121 | 131 | | |
122 | 132 | | |
123 | | - | |
| 133 | + | |
| 134 | + | |
| 135 | + | |
124 | 136 | | |
| 137 | + | |
125 | 138 | | |
| 139 | + | |
| 140 | + | |
126 | 141 | | |
127 | 142 | | |
128 | 143 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
148 | 148 | | |
149 | 149 | | |
150 | 150 | | |
| 151 | + | |
| 152 | + | |
| 153 | + | |
| 154 | + | |
| 155 | + | |
| 156 | + | |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
905 | 905 | | |
906 | 906 | | |
907 | 907 | | |
| 908 | + | |
| 909 | + | |
| 910 | + | |
| 911 | + | |
| 912 | + | |
| 913 | + | |
| 914 | + | |
0 commit comments