Serious miss in implementation #1562
itinsecurity
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
Hi @itinsecurity! During the /speckit.constitution, try to say to the model that yo want to use a TDD approach! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
As this is a question I am moving it to discussions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Consider this gem of an admission from Claude Code, after it edited and published the wrong file, that wasn't supposed to exist anymore:
speckit.implement.md does have a section to prevent this:
But that is apparently not enough...
Is there a way to improve those instructions, or those guiding test-creation, to avoid this? Similar things have happened a few times.
I will try coming up with something for myself (will post if I find a clear improvement) , but this is a kind of thing that should be really solid in the core commands.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions