Summary
When the assistant is mid-tool-call and the user sends multiple messages and/or system_notifications arrive in that window, the queued items are delivered to the assistant in a non-deterministic / out-of-send-order sequence.
Observed behaviour
In a long session that drives many background agents and async shells (typical of orchestration/supervisor workflows), the user types several short messages while a tool call is in flight (e.g. "and?", "bump", "why why why", "check again"). When the tool call returns and the assistant's next turn begins, the messages are NOT presented in the order they were sent.
Symptom from inside the loop: an older message can appear after a newer one, system_notifications interleave seemingly arbitrarily with user messages, and the assistant cannot reliably tell which user prompt is the "latest" intent.
Expected behaviour
Queued user messages and system notifications should be delivered to the assistant in strict send-time order (FIFO per channel, or globally ordered by enqueue timestamp). At minimum, the assistant should be able to read a monotonic timestamp on each so it can re-sort.
Impact
- The assistant answers a stale message as if it were the latest, ignoring follow-ups.
- In an operator-driven loop (supervised PR dispatch, multi-agent orchestration) the user can't trust the assistant heard the most recent instruction.
- Causes the user to repeat themselves and escalates frustration.
Two related observations (may be the same root cause or separate)
- Two queues, not one. There appear to be two delivery channels (user messages and
system_notifications) and they are interleaved with no obvious total order. A single ordered queue would be simpler to reason about.
- No visible enqueue timestamp. Each
<user_message> includes a <current_datetime> that looks like the delivery time, not the send time. So even if the assistant wanted to re-sort, it lacks the data.
Repro
- Start a session that dispatches a 2–5 minute background tool call.
- While it's running, send 3–5 short user messages, each ~10 s apart.
- When the tool completes, observe the next assistant turn — the messages are not always processed in send order.
Suggested fix
- Single FIFO queue across user messages + system_notifications, OR
- Tag each delivered item with a monotonic
enqueuedAt so the assistant can sort, AND
- Document the ordering guarantee in the agent docs.
Environment
- GitHub Copilot CLI v1.0.54
- Windows
- Long-running multi-agent session
Refs
Filed at operator's explicit request after the issue reproduced multiple times in a single session.
Summary
When the assistant is mid-tool-call and the user sends multiple messages and/or
system_notifications arrive in that window, the queued items are delivered to the assistant in a non-deterministic / out-of-send-order sequence.Observed behaviour
In a long session that drives many background agents and async shells (typical of orchestration/supervisor workflows), the user types several short messages while a tool call is in flight (e.g. "and?", "bump", "why why why", "check again"). When the tool call returns and the assistant's next turn begins, the messages are NOT presented in the order they were sent.
Symptom from inside the loop: an older message can appear after a newer one, system_notifications interleave seemingly arbitrarily with user messages, and the assistant cannot reliably tell which user prompt is the "latest" intent.
Expected behaviour
Queued user messages and system notifications should be delivered to the assistant in strict send-time order (FIFO per channel, or globally ordered by enqueue timestamp). At minimum, the assistant should be able to read a monotonic timestamp on each so it can re-sort.
Impact
Two related observations (may be the same root cause or separate)
system_notifications) and they are interleaved with no obvious total order. A single ordered queue would be simpler to reason about.<user_message>includes a<current_datetime>that looks like the delivery time, not the send time. So even if the assistant wanted to re-sort, it lacks the data.Repro
Suggested fix
enqueuedAtso the assistant can sort, ANDEnvironment
Refs
Filed at operator's explicit request after the issue reproduced multiple times in a single session.