Shared: Fix this bad join on neovim:

```
Pipeline standard for RangeAnalysisImpl::ConstantStage::boundedPhiRankStep/8#99a39015@cc6f89w5 was evaluated in 8990 iterations totaling 85259ms (delta sizes total: 721932).
            685940   ~0%    {9} r1 = SCAN `RangeAnalysisImpl::ConstantStage::boundedPhiRankStep/8#99a39015#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.6, _, In.7
            685940   ~0%    {8}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 1, Out.7 := (Tmp.7 + In.8) KEEPING 8
        2160316026   ~1%    {10}    | JOIN WITH `RangeAnalysisImpl::ConstantStage::boundedPhiCandValidForEdge/9#17e05352#prev` ON FIRST 7 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.7, Rhs.8, Lhs.7, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6
            613801   ~7%    {8}    | JOIN WITH `RangeUtils::MakeUtils<SemanticLocation::SemLocation,RangeAnalysisImpl::Sem,FloatDelta::FloatDelta>::rankedPhiInput/4#d3c444f0` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, Lhs.9, Lhs.3

          44172265   ~0%    {9} r2 = SCAN `RangeAnalysisImpl::ConstantStage::boundedPhiCandValidForEdge/9#17e05352#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.7, In.8, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.6

          44172265   ~0%    {9} r3 = JOIN r2 WITH `RangeUtils::MakeUtils<SemanticLocation::SemLocation,RangeAnalysisImpl::Sem,FloatDelta::FloatDelta>::rankedPhiInput/4#d3c444f0` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, _, Rhs.3
          44172265   ~0%    {9}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 1, Out.7 := (InOut.8 - Tmp.7)
              4135   ~0%    {8}    | JOIN WITH `RangeAnalysisImpl::ConstantStage::boundedPhiRankStep/8#99a39015#prev` ON FIRST 8 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.8

          44172265   ~0%    {11} r4 = JOIN r2 WITH `RangeUtils::MakeUtils<SemanticLocation::SemLocation,RangeAnalysisImpl::Sem,FloatDelta::FloatDelta>::rankedPhiInput/4#d3c444f0` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.3, _
                            {10}    | REWRITE WITH Tmp.10 := 1, TEST InOut.9 = Tmp.10 KEEPING 10
            119942  ~16%    {10}    | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.7, In.8, _, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.6
            119942  ~17%    {10}    | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 1
            119942  ~24%    {8}    | JOIN WITH `RangeUtils::MakeUtils<SemanticLocation::SemLocation,RangeAnalysisImpl::Sem,FloatDelta::FloatDelta>::rankedPhiInput/4#d3c444f0` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, Lhs.9, _
            119942  ~22%    {8}    | REWRITE WITH Out.7 := 1

            737878   ~9%    {8} r5 = r1 UNION r3 UNION r4
            721932   ~6%    {8}    | AND NOT `RangeAnalysisImpl::ConstantStage::boundedPhiRankStep/8#99a39015#prev`(FIRST 8)
                            return r5
```

Author: MathiasVP

shared/rangeanalysis/codeql/rangeanalysis/RangeAnalysis.qll

@@ -1045,7 +1045,8 @@ module RangeStage<
     D::Delta origdelta, SemReason reason, int rix
   ) {
     exists(Sem::SsaVariable inp, SsaReadPositionPhiInputEdge edge |
-      rankedPhiInput(phi, inp, edge, rix) and
+      rankedPhiInput(pragma[only_bind_into](phi), pragma[only_bind_into](inp),
+        pragma[only_bind_into](edge), rix) and
       boundedPhiCandValidForEdge(phi, b, delta, upper, fromBackEdge, origdelta, reason, inp, edge)
     |
       rix = 1