|
1 | | -# Table Tiers |
| 1 | +# Data Tiers |
2 | 2 |
|
3 | | -The key to reproducibility in DataJoint is clear data provenance. In any experiment, |
4 | | -there are stages for data entry, ingestion, and processing or analysis. DataJoint |
5 | | -helps make these stages explicit with data tiers, indicating data origin. |
| 3 | +DataJoint assigns all tables to one of the following data tiers that differentiate how |
| 4 | +the data originate. |
6 | 5 |
|
7 | | -| Table Type | Description | Example | |
8 | | -| -- | -- | -- | |
9 | | -| Lookup | Small reference tables containing general information or settings. | Analysis parameter set. | |
10 | | -| Manual | Data entered entered with by hand or with external helper scripts. | Manual subject metadata entry. | |
11 | | -| Imported | Data ingested automatically from outside files. | Loading a raw data file. | |
12 | | -| Computed | Data computed automatically entirely inside the pipeline. | Running analyses and storing results. | |
13 | | -| Part\* | Data in a many-to-one relationship with the corresponding master table. While all other types correspond to their data tier, Part tables inherit the tier of their master table. | Independent unit results from a given analysis. | |
14 | | - |
15 | | -Lookup and Manual tables generally handle manually added data. Imported and Computed |
16 | | -tables both allow for automation, but differ in the source of information. And Part |
17 | | -tables have a unique relationship to their corresponding Master table. |
18 | | - |
19 | | -## Data Entry: Lookup and Manual |
20 | | - |
21 | | -Manual tables are populated during experiments through a variety of interfaces. Not all |
22 | | -manual information is entered by typing. Automated software can enter it directly into |
23 | | -the database. What makes a manual table manual is that it does not perform any |
24 | | -computations within the DataJoint pipeline. |
25 | | - |
26 | | -Lookup tables contain basic facts that are not specific to an experiment and are fairly |
27 | | -persistent. In GUIs, lookup tables are often used for drop-down menus or radio buttons. |
28 | | -In Computed tables, the contents of Lookup tables are often used to specify alternative |
29 | | -methods for computations. Unlike Manual tables, Lookup tables can specify contents in |
30 | | -the schema definition. |
31 | | - |
32 | | -Lookup tables are especially useful for entities with many unique features. Rather than |
33 | | -adding many primary keys, this information can be retrieved through an index. For an |
34 | | -example, see *ClusteringParamSet* in Element Array Ephys. |
35 | | - |
36 | | -<!-- TODO: Add link to ephys ClusteringParamSet --> |
37 | | - |
38 | | -While this distinction is useful for structuring a pipeline, it is not enforced, and |
39 | | -left to the best judgement of the researcher. |
40 | | - |
41 | | -## Automation: Imported and Computed |
42 | | - |
43 | | -Auto-populated tables are used to define, execute, and coordinate computations in a |
44 | | -DataJoint pipeline. These tables belong to one of the two auto-populated data tiers: |
45 | | -*Imported* and *Computed*. The difference is not strictly enforced, but the convention |
46 | | -helps researchers understand data provenance at a glance. |
47 | | - |
48 | | -*Imported* tables require access to external files, such as raw storage, outside the |
49 | | - database. If a entry were deleted, it could be retrieved from the raw files on disk. |
50 | | - An *EphysRecording* table, for example, would load metadata and raw data from |
51 | | - experimental recordings. |
52 | | - |
53 | | -<!-- TODO: Add link to EphysRecording --> |
54 | | - |
55 | | -*Computed* tables only require to other data within the pipeline. If an entry were |
56 | | - deleted, it could could be recovered by simply running the relevant command. For |
57 | | - analysis, many pipelines feature a task table that pairs sets of primary keys ready |
58 | | - for computation. The |
59 | | - [*PoseEstimationTask*](https://datajoint.com/docs/elements/element-deeplabcut/0.2/api/element_deeplabcut/model/#element_deeplabcut.model.PoseEstimationTask) |
60 | | - in Element DeepLabCut pairs videos and models. The |
61 | | - [*PoseEstimation*](https://datajoint.com/docs/elements/element-deeplabcut/0.2/api/element_deeplabcut/model/#element_deeplabcut.model.PoseEstimationTask) |
62 | | - table executes these computations and stores the results. |
63 | | - |
64 | | -Data should never be directly inserted into auto-populated tables. Instead, these tables |
65 | | -specify a [`make` method](../make-method). |
| 6 | +## Table tiers |
66 | 7 |
|
67 | | -## Master-Part Relationship |
68 | | - |
69 | | -An entity in one table might be inseparably associated with a group of entities in |
70 | | -another, forming a **master-part** relationship, with two important features. |
71 | | - |
72 | | -1. Part tables permit a many-to-one relationship with the master. |
73 | | - |
74 | | -2. Data entry and deletion should impact all part tables as well as the master. |
75 | | - |
76 | | -If you're considering adding a Part table, consider whether or not there could be a |
77 | | -reason to modify the part but not the master. If so, Manual and/or Lookup tables are |
78 | | -likely more appropriate. Populate and delete commands should always target the master, |
79 | | -and never individual parts. This facilitates data integrity by treating the entire |
80 | | -process as one transaction. Either (a) all data are inserted/committed or deleted, or |
81 | | -(b) the entire transaction is rolled back. This ensures that partial results never |
82 | | -appear in the database. |
83 | | - |
84 | | -As an example, Element Calcium Imaging features a *MotionCorrection* computed table |
85 | | -segmenting an image into masks. The resulting correction is inseparable from the rigid |
86 | | -and nonrigid correction parameters that it produces, with |
87 | | -*MotionCorrection.RigidMotionCorrection* and *MotionCorrection.NonRigidMotionCorrection* |
88 | | - part tables. |
89 | | - |
90 | | -<!-- TODO: Add calcium imaging link --> |
91 | | - |
92 | | -The master-part relationship cannot be chained or nested. DataJoint does not allow part |
93 | | -tables of other part tables. However, it is common to have a master table with multiple |
94 | | -part tables that depend on each other. See link above. |
95 | | - |
96 | | -## Example |
97 | | - |
98 | | -<!-- "src/images/concepts-table-tiers-diagram.md"--> |
99 | | - |
100 | | -In this example, the experimenter first enters information into the Manual tables, shown |
101 | | -in green. They enter information about a mouse, then a session, and then each scan |
102 | | -performed, with the stimuli. Next the automated portion of the pipeline takes over, |
103 | | -Importing the raw data and performing image alignment, shown in blue. Computed tables |
104 | | -are shown in red. Image segmentation identifies cells in the images, and extraction of |
105 | | -calcium traces. In grey, the segmentation method is a Lookup table. Finally, the |
106 | | -receptive field (RF) computation is performed by relating the imaging signals to the |
107 | | -visual stimulus information. |
108 | | - |
109 | | -For more information on table dependencies and diagrams, see their respective articles: |
110 | | - |
111 | | -- [Dependencies](./dependencies) |
112 | | -- [Diagrams](../diagrams) |
| 8 | +| Tier | Superclass | Description | |
| 9 | +| -- | -- | -- | |
| 10 | +| Lookup | `dj.Lookup` | Small tables containing general facts and settings of the data pipeline; not specific to any experiment or dataset. | |
| 11 | +| Manual | `dj.Manual` | Data entered from outside the pipeline, either by hand or with external helper scripts. | |
| 12 | +| Imported | `dj.Imported` | Data ingested automatically inside the pipeline but requiring access to data outside the pipeline. | |
| 13 | +| Computed | `dj.Computed` | Data computed automatically entirely inside the pipeline. | |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +Table data tiers indicate to database administrators how valuable the data are. |
| 16 | +Manual data are the most valuable, as re-entry may be tedious or impossible. |
| 17 | +Computed data are safe to delete, as the data can always be recomputed from within DataJoint. |
| 18 | +Imported data are safer than manual data but less safe than computed data because of |
| 19 | +dependency on external data sources. |
| 20 | +With these considerations, database administrators may opt not to back up computed |
| 21 | +data, for example, or to back up imported data less frequently than manual data. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +The data tier of a table is specified by the superclass of its class. |
| 24 | +For example, the User class in [definitions](declare.md) uses the `dj.Manual` |
| 25 | +superclass. |
| 26 | +Therefore, the corresponding User table on the database would be of the Manual tier. |
| 27 | +Furthermore, the classes for **imported** and **computed** tables have additional |
| 28 | +capabilities for automated processing as described in |
| 29 | +[Auto-populate](../../compute/populate.md). |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +## Internal conventions for naming tables |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +On the server side, DataJoint uses a naming scheme to generate a table name |
| 34 | +corresponding to a given class. |
| 35 | +The naming scheme includes prefixes specifying each table's data tier. |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +First, the name of the class is converted from `CamelCase` to `snake_case` |
| 38 | +([separation by underscores](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snake_case)). |
| 39 | +Then the name is prefixed according to the data tier. |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +- `Manual` tables have no prefix. |
| 42 | +- `Lookup` tables are prefixed with `#`. |
| 43 | +- `Imported` tables are prefixed with `_`, a single underscore. |
| 44 | +- `Computed` tables are prefixed with `__`, two underscores. |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +For example: |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +The table for the class `StructuralScan` subclassing `dj.Manual` will be named |
| 49 | +`structural_scan`. |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +The table for the class `SpatialFilter` subclassing `dj.Lookup` will be named |
| 52 | +`#spatial_filter`. |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +Again, the internal table names including prefixes are used only on the server side. |
| 55 | +These are never visible to the user, and DataJoint users do not need to know these |
| 56 | +conventions |
| 57 | +However, database administrators may use these naming patterns to set backup policies |
| 58 | +or to restrict access based on data tiers. |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +## Part tables |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +[Part tables](master-part.md) do not have their own tier. |
| 63 | +Instead, they share the same tier as their master table. |
| 64 | +The prefix for part tables also differs from the other tiers. |
| 65 | +They are prefixed by the name of their master table, separated by two underscores. |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +For example, the table for the class `Channel(dj.Part)` with the master |
| 68 | +`Ephys(dj.Imported)` will be named `_ephys__channel`. |
0 commit comments