Provide more interoperability with the broader public goods ecosystem

[cedricwaxwing]

• Universal project profiles registry (Gitcoin is working on this, we can use it when it’s ready)
• Hypercerts
• EAS compatibility - you see people's attestations, potentially giving someone points is a form of attestation

[magentaceiba]

Re: EAS - I had a call with someone from MetaGov today who is doing research on RPGF programs. He was asking about how DAO Drops measures impact within ourselves and in the projects. One thing he said he noticed is that projects that lean into measuring retroactive impact are missing something similar to the popularity contest problem - projects that haven't had enough resources to get well-known, or are in marginalized areas of development. So we should be mindful of this and the requests the EF made around that when we were developing DAO Drops. If we use EAS, we'd want to be careful about what fields or rubrik we ask people to evaluate on. For example, would it be possible to capture something like our initial rubrik categories - is the project underfunded relative to its stage and context, undervisible, positive impact potential for the ecosystem and the world, solving a problem no one else is solving (that one needs some tweaking since structurally sometimes a problem requires many small groups working on it).