|
2 | 2 | layout: post |
3 | 3 | title: "Low- and Mid-Tier Mobile for the Real World (2025)" |
4 | 4 | date: 2025-08-18 11:23:19 |
| 5 | +last_modified_at: 2025-08-20 |
5 | 6 | categories: Web Development |
6 | 7 | main: "/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/moto-g4.jpg" |
7 | 8 | meta: "Discover the most representative low- and mid-tier mobile devices for web performance testing in 2025." |
@@ -255,6 +256,27 @@ I actually went out and bought myself an A54 5G after conducting this research! |
255 | 256 | * Note 13 5G/Pro 5G are common mid-range alternatives to Samsung in Spain/CEE |
256 | 257 | * Useful to cross-check different SoC/storage stacks [^17] [^18] [^19] |
257 | 258 |
|
| 259 | +## WebPageTest Equivalents |
| 260 | + |
| 261 | +If you’d like to replicate these devices in |
| 262 | +[WebPageTest](https://www.webpagetest.org/), you’ll need to pick from their |
| 263 | +(slightly dated) device emulation list. While there aren’t any one-to-one |
| 264 | +matches for current hardware, there are some pretty close proxies. I’d |
| 265 | +recommend: |
| 266 | + |
| 267 | +* **Galaxy A15 5G → Pixel 3A** |
| 268 | + * Modest CPU, 4 GB RAM, mid-2019 mid-tier silicon. |
| 269 | + * This is almost bang-on for what a budget A-series feels like today. |
| 270 | + |
| 271 | +* **Galaxy A54 5G → Pixel 5** |
| 272 | + * Former ‘premium midrange’ Android. |
| 273 | + * Slightly older, but architecturally very close to the Exynos 1380. |
| 274 | + * Perfect stand-in for a global mid-tier. |
| 275 | + |
| 276 | +It’s worth stressing that these aren’t perfect matches (they never will be), but |
| 277 | +they’re close enough to give you realistic lab results when you can’t test |
| 278 | +directly on a physical device. |
| 279 | + |
258 | 280 | {% comment %} |
259 | 281 | ## Regional Variants |
260 | 282 |
|
|
0 commit comments