Skip to content

Commit 46b635d

Browse files
committed
Add note about WebPageTest
1 parent e1949e8 commit 46b635d

File tree

1 file changed

+22
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+22
-0
lines changed

_posts/2025-08-18-low-and-mid-tier-mobile-for-the-real-world-2025.md

Lines changed: 22 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
22
layout: post
33
title: "Low- and Mid-Tier Mobile for the Real World (2025)"
44
date: 2025-08-18 11:23:19
5+
last_modified_at: 2025-08-20
56
categories: Web Development
67
main: "/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/moto-g4.jpg"
78
meta: "Discover the most representative low- and mid-tier mobile devices for web performance testing in 2025."
@@ -255,6 +256,27 @@ I actually went out and bought myself an A54 5G after conducting this research!
255256
* Note 13 5G/Pro 5G are common mid-range alternatives to Samsung in Spain/CEE
256257
* Useful to cross-check different SoC/storage stacks [^17] [^18] [^19]
257258

259+
## WebPageTest Equivalents
260+
261+
If you’d like to replicate these devices in
262+
[WebPageTest](https://www.webpagetest.org/), you’ll need to pick from their
263+
(slightly dated) device emulation list. While there aren’t any one-to-one
264+
matches for current hardware, there are some pretty close proxies. I’d
265+
recommend:
266+
267+
* **Galaxy A15 5G → Pixel 3A**
268+
* Modest CPU, 4 GB RAM, mid-2019 mid-tier silicon.
269+
* This is almost bang-on for what a budget A-series feels like today.
270+
271+
* **Galaxy A54 5G → Pixel 5**
272+
* Former ‘premium midrange’ Android.
273+
* Slightly older, but architecturally very close to the Exynos 1380.
274+
* Perfect stand-in for a global mid-tier.
275+
276+
It’s worth stressing that these aren’t perfect matches (they never will be), but
277+
they’re close enough to give you realistic lab results when you can’t test
278+
directly on a physical device.
279+
258280
{% comment %}
259281
## Regional Variants
260282

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)