You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
<imgsrc="{{ site.cloudinary }}/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/blocking-status.png"alt="Comparison of non-blocking, render-blocking, and parser-blocking resources in web performance. A visual breakdown of how different loading strategies affect rendering, parsing, and blocking behaviour in the browser."width="750"height="424">
67
67
<figcaption>
68
68
A non-, render-, and parser-blocking file in an HTML document. Imagine the
69
69
downloading file (pink) is in the <code><head></code>—even though you can
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ anyway…
125
125
Imagine you’ve built a simple countdown or stopwatch app:
<imgsrc="{{ site.cloudinary }}/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/foft.gif"alt="A digital stopwatch running an HTML file, displaying ‘00:51’ in large green text before unceremoniously changing its typeface and continuing to count down."width="750"height="432">
129
129
<figcaption>The change from fallback font to web font causes a very noticeable
130
130
change in UI. This might be unacceptable.</figcaption>
131
131
</figure>
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ snippets eschew this behaviour and take an all-or-nothing approach: nothing,
<imgsrc="{{ site.cloudinary }}/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/anti-flicker.png"alt="Progressive rendering sequence of a webpage displaying a web performance consultancy service. The timeline from 0.8s to 1.7s shows how content and images load incrementally, highlighting the impact of rendering delays."width="750"height="223">
242
242
<figcaption>A regular, progressive render (top) versus an anti-flicker
243
243
big-reveal (bottom). Which do you think is the better experience?</figcaption>
0 commit comments