I noticed that in lines L77-L81, the suffix are declared without an underscore prefix, but in lines L321-L333, they are defined with an underscore prefix. As a result, the former cannot be used. Is this intentional?
|
// [cstring.view.literals], suffix for basic_cstring_view literals |
|
constexpr cstring_view operator"" csv(const char* str, size_t len) noexcept; |
|
constexpr u8cstring_view operator"" csv(const char8_t* str, size_t len) noexcept; |
|
constexpr u16cstring_view operator"" csv(const char16_t* str, size_t len) noexcept; |
|
constexpr u32cstring_view operator"" csv(const char32_t* str, size_t len) noexcept; |
|
constexpr wcstring_view operator"" csv(const wchar_t* str, size_t len) noexcept; |
|
// [cstring.view.literals], suffix for basic_cstring_view literals |
|
constexpr cstring_view operator""_csv(const char* str, size_t len) noexcept { return basic_cstring_view(str, len); } |
|
constexpr u8cstring_view operator""_csv(const char8_t* str, size_t len) noexcept { |
|
return basic_cstring_view(str, len); |
|
} |
|
constexpr u16cstring_view operator""_csv(const char16_t* str, size_t len) noexcept { |
|
return basic_cstring_view(str, len); |
|
} |
|
constexpr u32cstring_view operator""_csv(const char32_t* str, size_t len) noexcept { |
|
return basic_cstring_view(str, len); |
|
} |
|
constexpr wcstring_view operator""_csv(const wchar_t* str, size_t len) noexcept { |
|
return basic_cstring_view(str, len); |
|
} |
I noticed that in lines L77-L81, the suffix are declared without an underscore prefix, but in lines L321-L333, they are defined with an underscore prefix. As a result, the former cannot be used. Is this intentional?
cstring_view/include/beman/cstring_view/cstring_view.hpp
Lines 76 to 81 in 097c505
cstring_view/include/beman/cstring_view/cstring_view.hpp
Lines 320 to 333 in 097c505