🏁 The Road to v1.1.0 #62
Pinned
xMinhx
started this conversation in
Roadmap & Prioritization
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
SecureCheckPlus v1.1.0 - Proposed Release Thread
Before anything else: unblock CI
Right now, all PRs are effectively stuck because the workflow still expects self-hosted runners that are no longer available.
That means the first thing we need to do for v1.1.0 is:
ubuntu-latestWithout that, the rest of the release does not really move.
What should be in v1.1.0
The goal for v1.1.0 should be pretty simple:
This should mostly be a stabilization and polish release, not a big feature release.
1. Better onboarding and documentation
Right now, it is still too hard for a new user or contributor to understand what SecureCheckPlus is, how it is structured, and how to get it running.
For v1.1.0, we should improve that with:
Why this matters:
Good onboarding lowers the barrier for contributors and makes the project much easier to try out.
2. Improve the report experience
In the report view the UX here should feel finished.
The main improvements we should land are:
Why this matters:
These changes make the product easier to use and easier to understand, especially for people who are not deep in security every day.
3. Fix confusing or incorrect behavior
There are a few bugs, those should be part of v1.1.0.
4. Production and local deployment stability
For v1.1.0, that means:
SERVER_URLdefault so local Docker setups do not throw unnecessary warnings (fix: set local adapter SERVER_URL default (supersedes #55) #59, closes Inconsistency in default environment #40)Small on paper, but important for credibility.
5. One additional feature worth considering
If we want to add one small feature on top of the stabilization work, the best candidate is probably this:
Right now, waiver information is buried inside individual CVE detail pages. That makes it harder to audit what has already been accepted and why.
A basic first version for v1.1.0 could be:
The PDF export part can wait until a later release.
This would be useful, visible to users, and still reasonably contained.
What we should not pull into v1.1.0
To keep this release focused, these items should stay out of scope for now:
I'd recommend the following merge order, feel free to add your own opinions:
then close fixed warning about missing env variable by setting default value #55 as superseded
A note on #58
PR #58 is valuable, but it is also the biggest change in this batch.
It introduces a cleaner frontend/backend split and a much better local preview story, but it should get a deliberate review because it changes how people run the project locally.
Summary
My take for v1.1.0 is:
Want to help?
Last updated: 2026-04-04
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions