Skip to content

Consider using scancode license expression version #1110

@TG1999

Description

@TG1999
          Also see https://github.com/nexB/vulnerablecode/pull/1102/files#diff-aa2cf137c50d3fb0242d00e7fbe786cc8e3d8c3d22c32b8afedde439965f2fb9R49, any reason we are using SPDX version of the license expression with `spdx_license_expression` instead of the scancode license expression version?

Originally posted by @AyanSinhaMahapatra in #1102 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions