From 65c4bb4e61ef97751d5ebdf8c78dc89623edb6e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Rowe <mark@vector35.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 09:48:37 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Rust] Fix clippy + rustfmt complaints

The clippy complaint was a real issue: the doc comment intended for
the commented-out `unresolved_indirect_branches` was being interpreted as
the start of the doc comment for the following function.
---
 rust/src/function.rs | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/rust/src/function.rs b/rust/src/function.rs
index de6d2d4126..04722809ab 100644
--- a/rust/src/function.rs
+++ b/rust/src/function.rs
@@ -2371,8 +2371,8 @@ impl Function {
         unsafe { BNHasUnresolvedIndirectBranches(self.handle) }
     }
 
-    /// List of address of unresolved indirect branches
     /*
+    /// List of address of unresolved indirect branches
     pub fn unresolved_indirect_branches(&self) -> Array<Arch> {
         let mut count = 0;
         let result = unsafe { BNGetUnresolvedIndirectBranches(self.handle, &mut count) };