kanerva-answer.tex

\documentclass[12pt]{article}

\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{subfig}
\usepackage{amsthm}

\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\usepackage{etoolbox}
%\AtBeginEnvironment{theorem}{\large}


\begin{document}


[Thesis text....] ...As one can easily notice, we have got exactly the same curve as Kanerva. Both his and our model expect that, after reading, say, from 550 bits of distance from a written bitstring, we should obtain the $n/2$ equator distance. We have not, however.  This question has intrigued us, and here we look for a more analytic explanation than merely interference from the other written attractors. Let us turn back to mathematics to study this anomaly.

\input{./Chapters/sdm-autocorrelation.tex}

\end{document}