Refactor of quality checks part 1 #206
Description
To move this forward, how about we apply the general wording changes to the "usage" section in a brand new PR first, then we have another look at the table changes? I wouldn't mind including the this-is-what-red-really-means view of risks in the list too, which might be another good reason for formatting this a different way (not a table?) - and maybe we could do all of those table changes at the same time?
Originally posted by @andyblundell in #163 (review)