D-06: Reassess whether manual session naming is needed

[roobottom]

Summary

Review whether session names should remain user-entered, be auto-generated, or be removed from the flow.

Rationale

Round 1 research showed that users mostly entered generic names, which suggests the field may not add enough value to justify the extra step.

Traceability

• Decision: D-06
• Source: docs/decisions/round-1.md
• Finding: Round 1, finding 8
• Related assumptions: A-06 naming sessions is useful
• Labels: decision, research, round-1

Implementation checklist

• Review where manual session names are used across the prototype
• Decide whether to keep, auto-generate, or remove session naming
• Update the relevant content, templates, and flows to reflect the chosen approach
• Confirm whether any downstream screens rely on manual names for clarity
• Define what should be tested in the next round before making this permanent

Note

Live GitHub issue creation could not be completed because GitHub CLI is unavailable in the current environment.