-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Open
Labels
Description
Checked for duplicates
Yes - I've already checked
🐛 Describe the bug
When looking at the various repositories tracked at SonarQube Cloud, the "Coverage" stat for every single project is 0.0%
However, when implementing #104 we saw that coverage was indeed higher and coverage.xml files show coverage as high 97.44% (for peppi. Why this disparity?
🕵️ Expected behavior
I expect coverage numbers of SonarQube Cloud to be reported properly.
📜 To Reproduce
git clone --quiet https://github.com/NASA-PDS/peppicd peppipython3.13 -m venv .venvrm -f coverage.xml.venv/bin/pip install --editable '.[dev]'.venv/bin/toxxmllint --xpath 'string(/*/@line-rate)' coverage.xml 2>/dev/null
At this point you should see 0.9744.
Now visit https://sonarcloud.io/project/overview?id=NASA-PDS_peppi and note that the coverage is 0.0% throughout
🖥 Environment Info
- pytest 7.4.4
- tox 4.11.4
- SonarSource/sonarqube-scan-action@v6
📚 Version of Software Used
No response
🩺 Test Data / Additional context
No response
🦄 Related requirements
🦄 #xyz
⚙️ Engineering Details
No response
🎉 Integration & Test
No response
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Type
Projects
Status
ToDo