Can no longer install both debug and stable Catima installs

[TheLastProject]

My guess is this is caused by #1121, possibly by the permission: https://github.com/CatimaLoyalty/Android/pull/1121/files#diff-7fa6aef292187a049f7a4d6060d8df3ba212d838789c78940bd363344b1c38cd

After just building a new stable .apk when trying to release an update, the installation fails with the following message:

App not installed as package conflicts with an existing package.

Labelled as critical severity and frequent commonness as I need to be able to run both regular Catima (as I use it in my daily life) and debug Catima (for testing) and thus I cannot do a new release in the current state.

Ping @joserebelo :)

[joserebelo]

@TheLastProject I have both stable (self-built, with the permission) and debug versions installed, both with the permission 🤔 (I did test this use-case after your comment on the PR).

Not sure how to reproduce this, would you be able to send me the stable apk, or check logcat for the error?

[TheLastProject]

app-release.zip

Here's the new stable .apk I built today (that I planned to release).

logcat seems to imply that it is indeed the duplicate permission at fault here:

07-09 14:35:56.711  1641  1854 W PackageManager: Package me.hackerchick.catima attempting to redeclare permission me.hackerchick.catima.READ_CARDS already o
wned by me.hackerchick.catima.debug
07-09 14:35:56.716  1641  1854 D PackageInstallerSession: Marking session 1267431085 as failed: INSTALL_FAILED_DUPLICATE_PERMISSION: Package me.hackerchick.catima attempting to redeclare permission me.hackerchick.catima.READ_CARDS already owned by me.hackerchick.catima.debug

[joserebelo]

Interesting, it looks like the error only happens if the packages are signed by different keys, which is why I was able to have both installed :/

I'll open a PR in a few minutes.

[joserebelo]

PR open, I will do the necessary changes on the Gadgetbridge side later today, needs a slight refactor to request the permissions with the correct package name.

Apologies for the issue.. I completely forgot that some of these conflicts are allowed if the signature keys match.